Peer Review

Peer Review Process

All submissions to INTRA: Interdisciplinary Research and Analysis Journal undergo a rigorous double-blind external peer review process to ensure the highest quality and integrity of published work. In this process, both the authors and reviewers remain anonymous to each other, preserving objectivity and minimizing potential bias. Each manuscript is initially screened by the editorial team to assess its relevance to the journal's interdisciplinary scope, adherence to submission guidelines, and overall academic quality. Manuscripts that pass this initial screening are assigned to at least two independent external reviewers who are not members of the journal's editorial team and who possess expertise in the subject area of the submission.

Reviewers evaluate submissions based on criteria such as originality, methodological soundness, clarity of argument, theoretical contribution, and relevance to both specific disciplines and broader interdisciplinary conversations. Reviewers provide constructive feedback, recommendations for improvement, and a final recommendation to accept, revise, or reject the manuscript. Authors are expected to respond to reviewer comments thoroughly in their revised submissions. The editorial team makes the final publication decision based on reviewer feedback and the quality of the revisions. This peer review process is designed not only to uphold scholarly excellence but also to support authors in refining their work for broader academic impact.